Forced Labor and Colonial Development in Africa
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84090/8409028bf72968f4b008e5381d4aa571644bbe51" alt=""
As European powers began to assert hegemony in much of Africa during the early twentieth century, forced labor became a common and cheap method of organizing the labor of colonial subjects. The impoverished colonial states needed cheap African labor for infrastructure development while, in settler colonies, European immigrants and business interests also required affordable labor to squeeze out profit margins. 1 The myth of the lazy African male, unresponsive to economic incentives and lethargic due to the labor of his womenfolk, fueled the ideological justification for forced labor as an aspect of progressive rule. 2 Essentially, if Africans would not work for Europeans, which was in their best interests anyway, they must be forced to work. Out of this moral and economic “dilemma” of development grew the multiheaded Hydra of forced labor in Africa: forced labor for private interests, government forced labor, and coercion in the interests of community. In this chapter we first, broadly, examine the general archetypes of forced labor in colonial Africa and their connection to economic development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save
Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (France)
eBook EUR 42.79 Price includes VAT (France)
Softcover Book EUR 52.74 Price includes VAT (France)
Hardcover Book EUR 52.74 Price includes VAT (France)
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Similar content being viewed by others
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4455f/4455fb73b38400b68eda69c5d78f9207703fc978" alt=""
Colonialism and Development in Africa
Chapter © 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4455f/4455fb73b38400b68eda69c5d78f9207703fc978" alt=""
Africans and the Colonial Economy
Chapter © 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ae1b/3ae1bb108de136fe71df4376c080f052b77f16e0" alt=""
The Economic Strategies of Occupation: Confining Development and Buying-off Peace
Chapter © 2014
Notes
- For example, it is estimated that Kng Leopold of Belgium extracted approximately 1.1 billion dollars’ worth of profit from the Belgian Congo, or as it was known, the Congo Free State. Adam Hochschild, King Leopold’s Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa (New York: Mariner Books, 1999), 277. Google Scholar
- For an anthropological analysis of the myth of the “lazy African,” see Esther Boserup, Woman’s Role in Economic Development (London: George Alen and Unwin, 1970), 15–37. In Europe and Asia men traditionally performed most of the agricultural labor. In Africa this situation was reversed with women performing most of the agricultural labor. To Europeans this indicated that African men were naturally lazy, and this innate African sloth explained why Europeans could not obtain free African labor in the market. Of course this viewpoint did not take into effect the sex typing of agricultural work in Africa. For example, men were responsible for building houses and grain stores; fencing and the maintenance of kraals (cattle enclosures); the first break of soils; watching the crops and cattle at night; dressing skins; making tools; building wells; and planting bananas, sugar cane, and tobacco. In a rejoinder to this myth of the lazy African male, see “Report of Kavirondo Association for Commission of Closer Union,” East African Standard, December 31, 1927. Perhaps, as Frederick Cooper states, the myth of the lazy African had more to do with the limits of European dominance over African labor power. Google Scholar
- Frederick Cooper, On the African Waterfront: Urban Disorder and the Transformation of Work in Colonial Mombasa (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987), 1. Google Scholar
- For example, see Charles van Onselen, Chibara: African Mine Labour in Southern Rhodesia, 1900–1933 (London: Pluto, 1976); Google Scholar
- A. T. Nzula, LI. Potekhin, and A. Z. Zusmanovich, Forced Labor in Colonial Africa (London: Zed, 1979). Aso, within a similar orbit, see Hochschild, King Leopold’s Ghost.Google Scholar
- This is a point noted by many labor historians. See Steven Rubert, A Most Promising Weed: A History of Tobacco Farming and Labor in Colonial Zimbabwe, 1890–1945 (Athens, OH: Ohio University Center for International Studies, 1998); Kitching, Class and Economic Change in Kenya; Google Scholar
- Giovanni Arrigghi, “Labor Supplies in Historical Perspective: A Study of Proletarianization of the African Peasantry in Rhodesia,” in Essays on the Political Economy of Africa, ed. Giovanni Arrighi and John Saul (New York: Monthly Review, 1973), 194. Google Scholar
- Frederick Cooper, “Conditions Analogous to Slavery: Imperialism and Free Labor Ideology in Africa,” in Beyond Slavery: Explorations of Race, Labor, and Citizenship in Postemancipation Societies, ed. Frederick Cooper, Rebecca Scott, and Thomas Holt (Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press, 2000), 134. Google Scholar
- The indigénat were a set of French colonial laws, applicable only to subjects, like indigène, that meted out differential treatment and secondary legal status for noncitizens in colonial territories. For example, under the indigénat, Africans could be detained for up to 15 days without trial for insubordination. Gregory Mann, “What Was the Indigénau The Empire of Law in French West Africa,” Journal of African History 50 (2009): 333–37. Google Scholar
- Anne Phillips, The Enigma of Colonialism: British Policy in West Africa (London: James Curry, 1989), 45–46. By way of contrast, in the more notorious Southern Rhodesia, where, at its worst, the yearly death rate for African miners peaked at 110 per 1,000 in 1918, by the 1920s the death rate had declined to about 16 deaths per 1,000 yearly. Van Onselen, Chibara, 50. Google Scholar
- Kwabena Akurang-Parry, “‘The Loads Are Heavier Than Usual’: Forced Labor by Women and Children in the Central Province, Gold Coast, C. A. 1900–1940,” African Economic History 30 (2001): 32. Google Scholar
- Ibid., 33, 39. Raymond Dumett, however, asserts that the use ofwomen as porters was precolonial legacy in the gold producing areas. Raymond Dumett, Eldorado in West Africa: The Gold Mining Frontier, African Labor, and Colonial Capitalism in the Gold Coast, 1875–1900 (Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 1998), 149. Google Scholar
- Francis Wilson, Labour in the South African Gold Mines, 1911–1969 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972), 1; even before the mineral revolution in the latter half of the nineteenth century, European settlers demanded African labor first as slaves then as workers on sugar plantations in Natal by the 1860s. Google Scholar
- Peter Richardson and Jean Jacques Van-Helton, “Labour in the South African Gold Mining Industry, 1886–1914,” in Industrialization and Social Change in South Africa: African Class Formation, Culture and Consciousness, 1870–1930, ed. Shula Marks and Richard Rathbone (London: Longman Group, 1982), 88. Google Scholar
- Moitsadi Moeti, “The Origins of Forced Labor in the Witwatersrand,” Phyton 47, no. 4 (1986): 281. Google Scholar
- David Johnson, “Settler Farmers and Coerced African Labour in Southern Rhodesia, 1936–46,” Journal of African History 33 (1992): 118–28. During World War II the administration in Southern Rhodesia resorted to forcing Africans to labor on the agricultural plantations. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bridget O’Laughlin, “Proletarianisation, Agency and Changing Rural Livelihods: Forced Labour and Resistance in Colonial Mozambique,” Journal of Southern African Studies 28, no. 3 (September 2002): 517. Google Scholar
- Allen Issacman, “Peasants, Work and the Labor Process: Forced Cotton Cultivation in Colonial Mozambique,” Journal of Social History 24, no. 4 (1992): 815. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liberia was formed as a colony for free blacks in the USA United States by the American Colonization Society in 1822. The first settlers were in fact African Americans who viewed themselves as Americans. In Liberia they came be known as Americo-Liberians to distinguish them from the native inhabitants. For more, on this, see Amos Beyan, The American Colonization Society and the Creation of the Liberian State: A Historical Perspective, 1822–1900 (Lanhzm, MD: University Press of America, 1991). Google Scholar
- Ibrahim Sundiata, Brothers and Strangers: Black Zion, Black Slavery, 1914–1940 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003), 84. Liberia and Sierra Leone comprised one of the major slave trading regions in Africa during the era of the transatlantic slave trade known as Upper Guinea Coast. For more on the slave trade in the Upper Guinea Coast, Google Scholar
- see Walter Rodney, A History of the Upper Guinea Coast (New York: Monthly Review, 1970); Google Scholar
- Walter Hawthorne, Planting Rice and Harvesting Slaves: Transformations along the Guinea-Bissau Coast, 1400–1900 (Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2003). Google Scholar
- E. D. Morel, Red Rubber: The Story of the Rubber Slave Trade Flourishing on the Congo in the Tear of Grace, 1906 (London: T. Fischer Unwin, 1907). Google Scholar
- For more on the forced labor abuses and the international campaign, see Ruth Slade, King Leopold’s Congo (London: Oxford University Press, 1962); Google Scholar
- Roger Antsey, King Leopold’s Legacy: The Congo under Belgium Rule, 1908–1960 (London: Oxford University Press, 1966); Google Scholar
- Kevin Grant, A Civilised Savagery: Britain and New Slaveries in Africa, 1884–1926 (New York: Routledge, 2005); Google Scholar
- E. D. Morel, King Leopold’s Rule in Africa (London: Heinemann, 1904); Adam Hochschild, King Leopold’s Ghost, Google Scholar
- Robert Harms, “The End of Red Rubber: A Reassessment,” Journal of African History 16 (1975): 73–88. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prakash, “Colonialism, Capitalism and the Discourse of Freedom,” 10. One of the impacts of the abolition movement that spawned both the Aborigines Protection Society (APS) and the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society (BFASS) was the development of slavery and freedom as two mutually exclusive forms of labor. See also Seymour Drescher, From Slavery to Freedom: Comparative Studies in the Rise and Fall of Atlantic Slavery (Washington Square: New York University Press, 1999), 428; BookGoogle Scholar
- Robert J. Steinfeld, The Invention of Free Labor: The Employment Relation in English American Law and Culture, 1350–1870 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991); Google Scholar
- David Brion Davis, The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution, 1770–1823 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1975). Google Scholar
- Patrick Manning, Slavery and African Life: Occidental, Oriental and African Slave Trades (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 30. Africans were not always the dominant slave source that they had become by the nineteenth century due to the impact of the transatlantic slave trade. Prior to the seventeenth century, Africans were not a major slave source worldwide. Other groups, like Slavic speakers from the Black Sea region featured more prominently as slaves. Ironically, during the nineteenth century when Europeans began to end the transatlantic slave trade, the East African slave trade began to slowly increase as Africans were now captured around the Great Lakes regions and sent to work on plantations owned by other “Africans” on the islands of Zanzibar, Pemba, and the East African coast. Google Scholar
- James Jones, Industrial Labor in the Colonial World: Workers of the Chemin de Fer Dakar-Niger, 1881–1963 (Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2002), 12. Google Scholar
- Martin Klein, Slavery and Colonial Rule in French West Africa (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 121. BookGoogle Scholar
- Catherine Ash, “Forced Labor in Colonial West Africa,” History Compass 4, no. 3 (2006): 403. ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Frederick Cooper, Decolonization and African Society: The Labor Question in French and British Africa (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996). BookGoogle Scholar
- Babacar Fall and Mohamed Mbodj, “Forced Labour and Mgration in Senegal,” in Forced Labour and Migration: Patterns of Movement Within Africa, ed. Abebe Zegey and Shubi Ishemo (London: Hans Zell Publishers, 1989), 258. Google Scholar
- Kwabena Akurang-Parry, “Colonial Forced Labor Policies for Road-Building in Southern Ghana and International Anti-Forced Labor Pressure, 1900–1940,” African Economic History 28 (2000): 10–16. Google Scholar
- Mchael Monson, “Working on the Railway: Forced Labor in Northern Nigeria, 1907–1912,” in African Labor History, ed. Peter Gutkind, Robin Cohen, and Jean Copans (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1978), 65. Google Scholar
- Keletso Atkins, The Moon Is Dead! Give Us Our Money! The Cultural Origins of an African Work Ethic, Natal, South Africa, 1843–1900 (Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1993), 53. Google Scholar
- Jeff Guy, “The Destruction and Reconstruction of Zulu Society,” in Industrialization and Social Change in South Africa: African Class Formation, Culture and Consciousness, 1870–1930, ed. Shula Marks and Richard Rathbone (London: Longman Group, 1982), 177. Google Scholar
- Joan Vincent, Teso in Transformation: The Political Economy of Peasant and Class in Eastern Africa (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982), 215. Google Scholar
- Rchard Reid, Political Power in Pre-Colonial Buganda (Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2002), 104. During the precolonial time period in kingdom of Buganda, kasanvu functioned as a forced labor for building roads, bridges, and public buildings. Each province within Buganda was responsible for supplying labor from peasants known as bakopi.Google Scholar
- Holger Bernt Hansen, “‘Forced Labour in a Missionary Context’: A Study of Kasanvu in Early Twentieth-Century Uganda,” in Wages of Slavery: From Chattel Slavery to Wage Labour in Africa, the Caribbean and England, ed. Mchael Twaddle (London: Frank Cass, 1993), 189. Google Scholar
- Stichter, Migrant Labour in Kenya, 40; Giovanni Arrighi, “Labour Supplies in Historical Perspective: A Study of the Proletarianization of the African Peasantry in Rhodesia,” Journal of Development Studies 6 (1970); Google Scholar
- Paul Moseley, The Settler Economies: Studies in the Economic History of Kenya and Southern Rhodesia, 1900–1963 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), 142. For a contrasting viewpoint concerning the decline of extra market coercion, see Johnson, “Settler Farmers and Coerced African Labour in Southern Rhodesia,” 111–12. BookGoogle Scholar
- Conklin, A Mission to Civilize, 215. Part of the French allure for communal-based prestations was that prestations had been a part of French history as well during the nineteenth century. See also Roger Price, Modernization of Rural France: Communications Networks and Agricultural Market Structures in 19th Century France (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1983). Google Scholar
- David Northrup, Beyond the Bend in the River: African Labor in Eastern Zaire, 1865–1940 (Athens, OH: Ohio University Center for International Studies, 1988), 86. Google Scholar
- J. A. Kamchitete Kandawire, Thangata: Forced Labour or Reciprocal Assistance? (Zomba, Malawi: University of Malawi, 1979), 10. Google Scholar
- Opolot Okia
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Copyright information
© 2012 Opolot Okia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Okia, O. (2012). Forced Labor and Colonial Development in Africa. In: Communal Labor in Colonial Kenya. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230392960_2
Download citation
- DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230392960_2
- Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, New York
- Print ISBN : 978-1-349-35215-9
- Online ISBN : 978-0-230-39296-0
- eBook Packages : Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Get shareable link
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Copy to clipboard
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative